물론 vs 당연히: Comparing Natural Affirmative Expressions

물론 (mul-ron, mulron) · 당연히 (dang-yeon-hi, dangyeonhi)

물론 is used to affirm a question or expectation positively, while 당연히 emphasizes logical or moral inevitability.

Comparison of Korean words 물론 and 당연히 with usage examples

Word-by-word breakdown

One lane per word — no nested boxes, just the gist.

물론(mul-ron, mulron)

An expression used to positively respond to someone's question or expectation

When to use

positive answer to question, meeting expectation, casual conversation

The nuance

물론 is used to affirmatively answer when someone asks or expects something, meaning 'definitely' or 'of course'.

당연히(dang-yeon-hi, dangyeonhi)

An expression used to emphasize logical, moral inevitability or something that is naturally expected

When to use

logical inevitability, moral obligation emphasis, formal situations

The nuance

당연히 is used when something is logically or morally proper or inevitable.

Real-world examples

  • 너 내일 올 거지? 물론이지!

    neo nae-il ol geo-ji? mul-ron-i-ji!, neo nae il ol geo ji? mul ron i ji!

    '물론' fits as a friendly, definite positive answer to a question.

  • 그가 거짓말할 리가 없지. 당연히 믿어야 해.

    geu-ga geo-jis-mal-hal ri-ga eop-ji. dang-yeon-hi mit-eo-ya hae., geu ga geo jis mal hal ri ga eop ji. dang yeon hi mit eo ya hae.

    '당연히' is appropriate to emphasize logical trustworthiness.

  • 이 일은 당연히 네가 해야 해.

    i il-eun dang-yeon-hi ne-ga hae-ya hae., i il eun dang yeon hi ne ga hae ya hae.

    '당연히' is correct when emphasizing moral obligation.

  • 내가 도와줄게. 당연하지!

    nae-ga do-wa-jul-ge. dang-yeon-ha-ji!, nae ga do wa jul ge. dang yeon ha ji!

    '당연하지' emphasizes moral or logical inevitability; for friendly promises, '물론' is more natural.

  • 그 영화 재미있지? 당연히!

    geu yeong-hwa jae-mi-iss-ji? dang-yeon-hi!, geu yeong hwa jae mi iss ji? dang yeon hi!

    '물론' suits simple positive answers; '당연히' is an overemphasis here.

  • 시험 공부는 당연히 해야지.

    si-heom gong-bu-neun dang-yeon-hi hae-ya-ji., si heom gong bu neun dang yeon hi hae ya ji.

    '당연히' fits when referring to logically or morally proper actions.

  • 너도 올 거야? 당연하지!

    neo-do ol geo-ya? dang-yeon-ha-ji!, neo do ol geo ya? dang yeon ha ji!

    '물론' is natural for friendly positive answers; '당연히' sounds stiff here.

  • 회의는 오후 3시에 시작해. 물론 알았어.

    hoe-ui-neun o-hu 3si-e si-jak-hae. mul-ron al-ass-eo., hoe ui neun o hu 3si e si jak hae. mul ron al ass eo.

    '물론' is appropriate for affirming understanding of information.

Quick quiz

  1. Which expression fits as a definite positive answer to a friendly question?

    친근한 질문에 확실한 긍정 답변으로 적절한 표현은?(chin-geun-hanjil-mun-ehwak-sil-hangeung-jeongdap-byeon-eu-rojeok-jeol-hanpyo-hyeon-eun?, chingeunhanjilmunehwaksilhangeungjeongdapbyeoneurojeokjeolhanpyohyeoneun?)
  2. Which expression is appropriate to emphasize logical inevitability?

    논리적 필연성을 강조할 때 적절한 표현은?(non-ri-jeokpil-yeon-seong-eulgang-jo-halttaejeok-jeol-hanpyo-hyeon-eun?, nonrijeokpilyeonseongeulgangjohalttaejeokjeolhanpyohyeoneun?)
  3. Which expression is used to talk about moral obligation?

    도덕적 의무를 말할 때 쓰는 표현은?(do-deok-jeokui-mu-reulmal-halttaesseu-neunpyo-hyeon-eun?, dodeokjeokuimureulmalhalttaesseuneunpyohyeoneun?)
  4. Which expression does NOT fit a friendly promise reply?

    친근한 약속 답변에 어울리지 않는 표현은?(chin-geun-hanyak-sokdap-byeon-eeo-ul-ri-jian-neunpyo-hyeon-eun?, chingeunhanyaksokdapbyeoneeoulrijianneunpyohyeoneun?)

More comparisons to explore

View all word comparisons →